Image and video hosting by TinyPic Image and video hosting by TinyPic Image and video hosting by TinyPic Bilder hochladen
14
Juni
2019

More length and more size being added to the Falcons secondary.

Late in the 2019 NFL Draft Womens Sherrick McManis Jersey , the Atlanta Falcons set forth to add more talent to their young secondary. It’s time to dissect the skill set of new 5th round rookie corner, Jordan Miller. Change within the Falcons secondary was pretty much predestined after a 2018 season in which the Falcons was 27th in passing yards allowed and 29th in passing touchdowns allowed. Sprinkle in the contractual circumstance of former Falcons Robert Alford and Brian Poole and the team set forth a plan to improve on what was a season long obstacle for the defense. During this year’s draft, the Falcons decided to address the secondary with a couple of athletic prospects with hopes of providing better skill to the unit. Let’s take a look at their 2019 fifth round selection, Washington cornerback Jordan Miller. Jordan Miller Scouting Report Height: 6’1 Weight: 186 lbs Career stats: 61 total tackles, six interceptions, 11 pass deflections, three forced fumbles Games watched: 2018 vs. Washington State, 2018 vs. Utah, 2018 vs. Utah (Pac-12 title game), 2019 vs. Ohio State Strengths: Miller has considerable height and length that fits in the Falcons Cover-3 scheme and what they want to do. Miller has track experience dating back to high school in the 100-meter and long jump competitions. His recorded 4.49 speed at the NFL Combine does not necessarily show up on film but that is largely due to his long striding motion as a runner. Nevertheless, Miller is able to keep stride against receivers in deep coverage. The corner out of San Diego well times his punch on the ball to contest catches. That punch also comes into play when Miller is tasked to play press coverage. According to Pro Football Focus, Miller allowed a 23.0 passer rating when targeted on deep throws during his collegiate career and did not allow a reception on a deep ball the past two seasons. His overall footwork as a corner is another one of his positives in his skill set. Playing the ball while in the air does not happen often for Miller but when he does, he becomes the receiver and has a “the ball is mine” mentality. Weaknesses: Lanky Charles Leno Jersey , thin frame that can use some weight to battle the bigger, faster NFL receivers. While he ran well at the Combine, Miller only mustered up six total reps on the 225-lb bench press. That raises notable red flags in regards to his play strength overall. The lack of play strength plays a hand in his overall tackling ability which is average at best. His contributions in run defense should not be relied upon just yet. Miller will show signs of abandoning his technique and resorts to getting a little grabby. Miller’s change of direction ability also needs a little work. Conclusion: The cornerback position was the second position where the Falcons decided to take two prospects and for me, the selection of Miller was a mild surprise. Hopes have been established that second-year corner Isaiah Oliver is ready to be a full-time starter and versatile defensive back Damontae Kazee will see considerable time as a slot corner. So depth was needed to be improved. Miller reminds me a little of 2015 second round pick Jalen Collins, albeit a poor man’s version. Both are long corners who didn’t have great size in terms of weight but provided length, solid straight line speed but also lacked overall physicality with questionable play strength. Hopefully, Miller does not bring the constant headaches that Collins provided but Miller is what head coach Dan Quinn prefers in his corners. Year one will be a trying out phase and most of his field play will likely come via special teams. However, Miller can be a fit as a dime corner in spots during his rookie year and if he’s able to get stronger, has potential down the line to be a starter if need be. Robert S. dives into the film vault to evaluate both new Bears and old, analyzing the play tendencies of Ha Ha Clinton-Dix and Adrian Amos."Being who you thought we were since 2005!Log In or Sign UpLog InSign UpFanpostsFanshotsSectionsBearsOddsAboutMastheadCommunity GuidelinesStubHubMoreAll 322 blogs on Horizontal - WhiteFanposts Fanshots Sections Latest NewsThe Bears DenNotesXs and OsSuperfansBreaking News:The Bears' 2019 Draft class is complete!脳Xs and OsVideoRoster AnalysisFilm Study: Comparing Ha Ha Clinton-Dix and Adrian AmosNew,64commentsRobert S. dives into the film vault to evaluate both new Bears and old, analyzing the play tendencies of Ha Ha Clinton-Dix and Adrian Amos.CDTShareTweetShareShareFilm Study: Comparing Ha Ha Clinton-Dix and Adrian AmosClinton-Dix tracks Barkley out of the backfieldGeoff Burke-USA TODAY SportsThe Chicago Bears and the Green Bay Packers have a historic rivalry. Their fanbases don’t like each other, so when the teams swapped safeties in free agency no one was surprised to see each side proclaim their new safety to be the better safety of the two. But which safety is better? And how do they fit into their defenses? I’ll attempt to answer these questions and more in this two-part film study!We’ll discuss Clinton-Dix and Amos as players in this article http://www.thebearslockerroom.com/authentic-joel-iyiegbuniwe-jersey , part 1, before assessing how they fit into their new defenses in part 2. As usual, if the videos don’t show up on your platform simply look for the italicized portion of the paragraph, it’ll be a link to the video I’m referencing. Without any further ado, let’s get into it!Ha Ha Clinton-DixWatching HCD play the pass is, simply put, a lot of fun. He exhibits all the traits you’d expect of a true free safety, namely range and anticipation on deep throws like those shown here. When the ball is in the air, Ha Ha’s at his best.Pay close attention to Clinton-Dix’s hips at the release point of each throw and you’ll see what makes him so effective — Ha Ha’s big plays come from his ability to get his hips turned towards the intended receiver before the QB’s even finished throwing the ball. This is what “instinct” looks like, and it’s quintessential to making plays as a free safety. Ha Ha’s instincts make him dangerous.But the ball isn’t always in the air, and that’s bad news for Clinton-Dix. Whether he’s missing tackles outright, giving up extra yardage, or getting blocked into oblivion Womens Nick Kwiatkoski Jersey , Ha Ha rarely contributes positively against the run/short pass game. The play where Jason Witten blocks him from stopping a touchdown bothers me the most — Ha Ha doesn’t seem to make much of an effort to escape Witten’s grasp, and the Packers give up a touchdown because of it.HCD also tends to struggle when taking angles towards runners, often overrunning them altogether. While obviously not a good trait, this does help explain why HCD so rarely plays downhill — there’s no sense attacking an RB/WR downfield if you’re not confident you can finish the tackle. Regardless, his angles and tackling cost his defenses yards.All of this said, it should be noted that Ha Ha can still fill holes against the run (play 1) and actually plays quite well when moving laterally. He seems comfortable shuffling sideways, even taking on blocks well while doing so. He misses many less tackles from his shuffle too. This gives me the impression that Clinton-Dix’s tackling problems come primarily from situations where he has to attack downfield and that he becomes a much more consistent tackler when allowed to let the runner come to him.The Verdict: Ha Ha Clinton-Dix displays traits of a classic free safety, doing his best work with the ball in the air. He has experience playing single-high, two-deep and NCB, making him a versatile tool for Pagano to use. Tackling/downhill play is a legitimate concern, but his instinct in coverage and turnover generation skills go a long way towards making up for his poor tackling.Now let’s move on to...Adrian AmosLet’s start with what he’s best known for — reliable positioning and great form tackling. Amos plays fearless, active football and consistently meets runners as they breach the line. I love this last play because it highlights’ Amos tenacity when rallying to runners.Amos also has a reputation among Bears fans as being a lackluster cover safety, and that’s simply not fair. Amos does a great job covering anything in front of him Prince Amukamara Jersey , tracking short throws well and demolishing WRs at the catch point. He’s also sound in man-to-man coverage (play 3).Amos’s coverage struggles come in situations that ask for instinct rather than speed, namely deeper throws. The helmet-to-helmet hit on Ertz, for example, could’ve been avoided if he’d reached the sidelines quickly enough to play the ball. Instead, what should’ve been a 3rd down stop becomes a 1st down due to penalty.Instinct (or lack thereof) is a funny trait, and it’s one that’s certainly more visible on film than it is on a stat sheet. Amos’s tape is littered with plays like these that could’ve been INTs, but weren’t. His inability to generate takeaways is no-doubt his biggest “flaw”.It’s worth pointing out that this deep coverage issue is pretty much the only major flaw I see in Amos’s game, and I mean that as a compliment. Amos is positionally sound, covers well, attacks downfield, and can tackle both in a pile and the open field. He’s a very, very good player, and a great pick out of the 5th round.The Verdict: Adrian Amos has all the tools that make up a great box safety. He’s actually faster than Jackson/Clinton-Dix when it comes to sheer footspeed http://www.thebearslockerroom.com/authentic-adam-shaheen-jersey , but his utter lack of anticipation tends to make him look slower. He struggles with the nuances of deep coverage, often leaving him vulnerable to deeper sideline throws as well as lobs over the middle. But if you can protect him in coverage, he’ll offer all of the run/short pass support you could ask for from a safety.As for who’s better? From a pure player perspective, I think it’s Amos. Jackson proved that a great free safety can cover his weaknesses, but you can’t cover for bad tackling. Every player on the defensive side of the ball is expected to tackle eventually, so I have little doubt that Clinton-Dix’s weakness will hurt the Bears regardless of the talent placed around him. Whether he’ll outright miss tackles or simply give up enough yardage to allow first downs is something I can’t predict because we don’t know his role in the defense yet.That’s the problem with evaluating “Ha Ha versus Amos” right now — we don’t know their defensive roles. Amos’s effectiveness will totally depend on whether he’s asked to play in the box versus playing deep coverage, and Ha Ha should spend as little time in the box as possible. We’ll cover what each defense generally looks like as well as a strategy I think the Bears may employ to help Ha Ha in part 2.



« Mike Williams is healthy and confidentNouvelles compétences d'entrée »


Weitere Artikel der Kategorie Allgemein
Weitere Informationen zu "More length and more size being added to the Falcons secondary."
Immer auf dem Laufenden bleiben!
Neueste Artikel der Kategorie Allgemein

Melden Sie sich an, um die Kommentarfunktion zu nutzen


Kommentar zu "More length and more size being added to the Falcons secondary." verfassen

Kostenloser Counter
Besucher
0 Mitglieder und 13 Gäste sind Online

Forum Statistiken
Das Forum hat 1944 Themen und 7092 Beiträge.